
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH CX50 vs Fendt F345GT

Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt F345GT
Utility
- power
- 45 hp
- displacement
- 173 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 21
CaseIHCaseIH CX50
vs
FendtFendt F345GT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CX50 higher · +8 hp (+18%)CX5053 hp
F345GT45 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CX50 is in the 48th percentile; F345GT is in the 39th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ F345GT higher · +8 ci (+5%)CX50165 ci
F345GT173 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CX50 is in the 44th percentile; F345GT is in the 46th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCX503
F345GT3
Median Utility Tractor4
CX50 is in the 23rd percentile; F345GT is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ F345GT higher · +13 (+163%)CX508
F345GT21
Median Utility Tractor12
CX50 is in the 23rd percentile; F345GT is in the 88th · 4,941 models
CX50 (A)F345GT (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fendt F345GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Fendt | — |
| Model | CX50 | F345GT | — |
| Category | Not recorded | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fendt F345GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | KHD | — |
| Model | 903.27 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 53hp | 45hp | ▲ CX50+8 hp · +18% |
| Rated RPM | 2,250RPM | 2,190RPM | ▲ CX50+60 RPM · +3% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 165ci | 173ci | ▲ F345GT+8 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.9in | ▲ F345GT+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ CX50+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fendt F345GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fendt F345GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 177in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 101in | — |
| Operating Weight | 7,286lb | 6,670lb | ▲ CX50+616 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fendt F345GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fendt F345GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fendt F345GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Two-wheel drive (2WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fendt F345GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fendt F345GT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 48th percentile (53 hp)B · 39th percentile (45 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 44th percentile (165 ci)B · 46th percentile (173 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 88th percentile (21)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 69th percentile (7,286 lb)B · 63rd percentile (6,670 lb)
A · CX50B · F345GTMedian Utility Tractor