Head to head · Utility
CaseIH CX50 vs Fiat 60-75
Image not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH CX50
vs
FiatFiat 60-75
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 60-75 higher · +6.1 hp (+12%)CX5053 hp
60-7559.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CX50 is in the 48th percentile; 60-75 is in the 53rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 60-75 higher · +14 ci (+8%)CX50165 ci
60-75179 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CX50 is in the 44th percentile; 60-75 is in the 47th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCX503
60-753
Median Utility Tractor4
CX50 is in the 23rd percentile; 60-75 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 60-75 higher · +8 (+100%)CX508
60-7516
Median Utility Tractor12
CX50 is in the 23rd percentile; 60-75 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
CX50 (A)60-75 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fiat 60-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Fiat | — |
| Model | CX50 | 60-75 | — |
| Category | Not recorded | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fiat 60-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Fiat | — |
| Model | 903.27 | 8035.05 | — |
| Power Output | 53hp | 59.1hp | ▲ 60-75+6.1 hp · +12% |
| Rated RPM | 2,250RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 165ci | 179ci | ▲ 60-75+14 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 4.1in | ▲ 60-75+0.4 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.5in | ▲ CX50+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fiat 60-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fiat 60-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 55.5in | — |
| Operating Weight | 7,286lb | 7,253lb | ▲ CX50+33 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fiat 60-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fiat 60-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | II/I | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fiat 60-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Two-wheel drive (2WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fiat 60-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH CX50 | Fiat 60-75 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 48th percentile (53 hp)B · 53rd percentile (59.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 44th percentile (165 ci)B · 47th percentile (179 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 69th percentile (7,286 lb)B · 69th percentile (7,253 lb)
A · CX50B · 60-75Median Utility Tractor