Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH CX90 vs Fendt 308 Ci
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 308 Ci
Utility
- power
- 88.6 hp
- displacement
- 247 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 21
CaseIHCaseIH CX90
vs
FendtFendt 308 Ci
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ CX90 higher · +1.4 hp (+2%)CX9090 hp
308 Ci88.6 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CX90 is in the 78th percentile; 308 Ci is in the 76th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 308 Ci higher · +3 ci (+1%)CX90244 ci
308 Ci247 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CX90 is in the 68th percentile; 308 Ci is in the 69th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCX904
308 Ci4
Median Utility Tractor4
CX90 is in the 50th percentile; 308 Ci is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 308 Ci higher · +13 (+163%)CX908
308 Ci21
Median Utility Tractor12
CX90 is in the 23rd percentile; 308 Ci is in the 88th · 4,941 models
CX90 (A)308 Ci (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Fendt 308 Ci | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Fendt | — |
| Model | CX90 | 308 Ci | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Fendt 308 Ci | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 1004.40T | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 90hp | 88.6hp | ▲ CX90+1.4 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ 308 Ci+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 247ci | ▲ 308 Ci+3 ci · +1% |
| Bore | 3.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Fendt 308 Ci | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Fendt 308 Ci | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 85.2in | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,170lb | 8,488lb | ▲ 308 Ci+318 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Fendt 308 Ci | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Fendt 308 Ci | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Fendt 308 Ci | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Fendt 308 Ci | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Fendt 308 Ci | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.2gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 78th percentile (90 hp)B · 76th percentile (88.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 69th percentile (247 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 88th percentile (21)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 77th percentile (8,170 lb)B · 79th percentile (8,488 lb)
A · CX90B · 308 CiMedian Utility Tractor