Image not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH CX90 vs Massey Ferguson 690T
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 690T
Utility
- power
- 90 hp
- displacement
- 248 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH CX90
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 690T
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedCX9090 hp
690T90 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
CX90 is in the 78th percentile; 690T is in the 78th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 690T higher · +4 ci (+2%)CX90244 ci
690T248 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
CX90 is in the 68th percentile; 690T is in the 70th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCX904
690T4
Median Utility Tractor4
CX90 is in the 50th percentile; 690T is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 690T higher · +4 (+50%)CX908
690T12
Median Utility Tractor12
CX90 is in the 23rd percentile; 690T is in the 50th · 4,941 models
CX90 (A)690T (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Massey Ferguson 690T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | CX90 | 690T | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Massey Ferguson 690T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Perkins | Same |
| Model | 1004.40T | A4.248 | — |
| Power Output | 90hp | 90hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 244ci | 248ci | ▲ 690T+4 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4in | ▲ 690T+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 5in | 5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Massey Ferguson 690T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Massey Ferguson 690T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 154in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 81in | — |
| Operating Weight | 8,170lb | 8,020lb | ▲ CX90+150 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Massey Ferguson 690T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Massey Ferguson 690T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | II | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Massey Ferguson 690T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Massey Ferguson 690T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH CX90 | Massey Ferguson 690T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 4.2gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 78th percentile (90 hp)B · 78th percentile (90 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 68th percentile (244 ci)B · 70th percentile (248 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 77th percentile (8,170 lb)B · 75th percentile (8,020 lb)
A · CX90B · 690TMedian Utility Tractor