CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 105C
Utility
- power
- 106 hp
- displacement
- 207 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 105C vs McCormick Intl X50.50
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl X50.50
Utility
- power
- 113 hp
- displacement
- 208 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 105C
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl X50.50
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ X50.50 higher · +7 hp (+7%)Farmall 105C106 hp
X50.50113 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 105C is in the 86th percentile; X50.50 is in the 88th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ X50.50 higher · +1 ci (<1%)Farmall 105C207 ci
X50.50208 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 105C is in the 57th percentile; X50.50 is in the 58th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 105C4
X50.504
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 105C is in the 50th percentile; X50.50 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ X50.50 higher · +93 lb (+1%)Farmall 105C7,937 lb
X50.508,030 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Farmall 105C is in the 75th percentile; X50.50 is in the 76th · 5,107 models
Farmall 105C (A)X50.50 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | Farmall 105C | X50.50 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | Perkins | — |
| Model | F5H | 854E-E34TA | — |
| Power Output | 106hp | 113hp | ▲ X50.50+7 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Farmall 105C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 207ci | 208ci | ▲ X50.50+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical Shuttle | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 149in | 164in | ▲ X50.50+15 in · +10% |
| Width | 83in | 83in | Same |
| Height | 100in | 101in | ▲ X50.50+1 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | 7,937lb | 8,030lb | ▲ X50.50+93 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105C | McCormick Intl X50.50 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 86th percentile (106 hp)B · 88th percentile (113 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 57th percentile (207 ci)B · 58th percentile (208 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 75th percentile (7,937 lb)B · 76th percentile (8,030 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 65th percentile (149 in)B · 82nd percentile (164 in)
A · Farmall 105CB · X50.50Median Utility Tractor