CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 105V
Row Crop
- power
- 106 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 32
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Farmall 105V vs CaseIH Maxxum 110
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH Maxxum 110
Row Crop
- power
- 110 hp
- displacement
- 273 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 105V
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Maxxum 110
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Maxxum 110 higher · +4 hp (+4%)Farmall 105V106 hp
Maxxum 110110 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Farmall 105V is in the 29th percentile; Maxxum 110 is in the 32nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 105V higher · +1 ci (<1%)Farmall 105V274 ci
Maxxum 110273 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Farmall 105V is in the 24th percentile; Maxxum 110 is in the 23rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 105V4
Maxxum 1104
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Farmall 105V is in the 17th percentile; Maxxum 110 is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Maxxum 110 higher · +4,261 lb (+71%)Farmall 105V5,979 lb
Maxxum 11010,240 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Farmall 105V is in the 12th percentile; Maxxum 110 is in the 33rd · 1,350 models
Farmall 105V (A)Maxxum 110 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105V | CaseIH Maxxum 110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | Farmall 105V | Maxxum 110 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105V | CaseIH Maxxum 110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Not recorded | — |
| Model | Not recorded | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 106hp | 110hp | ▲ Maxxum 110+4 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Farmall 105V+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 273ci | ▲ Farmall 105V+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105V | CaseIH Maxxum 110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Mechanical Shuttle | Mechanical shuttle / Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105V | CaseIH Maxxum 110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 42.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 114in | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,979lb | 10,240lb | ▲ Maxxum 110+4,261 lb · +71% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105V | CaseIH Maxxum 110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105V | CaseIH Maxxum 110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105V | CaseIH Maxxum 110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 105V | CaseIH Maxxum 110 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 29th percentile (106 hp)B · 32nd percentile (110 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 24th percentile (274 ci)B · 23rd percentile (273 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 17th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 12th percentile (5,979 lb)B · 33rd percentile (10,240 lb)
A · Farmall 105VB · Maxxum 110Median Row Crop Tractor