CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 50
Utility
- power
- 50 hp
- displacement
- 135 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 50 vs Ford 771
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 50
vs
FordFord 771
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 50 higher · +1.6 hp (+3%)Farmall 5050 hp
77148.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 50 is in the 45th percentile; 771 is in the 43rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 50 higher · +1 ci (<1%)Farmall 50135 ci
771134 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 50 is in the 33rd percentile; 771 is in the 31st · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 504
7714
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 50 is in the 50th percentile; 771 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Farmall 50 higher · +122 lb (+4%)Farmall 503,522 lb
7713,400 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Farmall 50 is in the 30th percentile; 771 is in the 28th · 5,107 models
Farmall 50 (A)771 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 50 | Ford 771 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Ford | — |
| Model | Farmall 50 | 771 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 50 | Ford 771 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Ford | — |
| Model | N844L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 50hp | 48.4hp | ▲ Farmall 50+1.6 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,800RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Farmall 50+600 RPM · +27% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 135ci | 134ci | ▲ Farmall 50+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.4in | ▲ 771+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 3.6in | ▲ Farmall 50+0.3 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 50 | Ford 771 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Synchro Shuttle | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 50 | Ford 771 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 125in | 132in | ▲ 771+7 in · +6% |
| Width | 66.6in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 90.8in | 65.1in | ▲ Farmall 50+25.7 in · +39% |
| Operating Weight | 3,522lb | 3,400lb | ▲ Farmall 50+122 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 50 | Ford 771 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power assist | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 50 | Ford 771 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: I | Category I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 50 | Ford 771 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power assist | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 50 | Ford 771 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 50 | Ford 771 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.8gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 50 | Ford 771 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 45th percentile (50 hp)B · 43rd percentile (48.4 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 33rd percentile (135 ci)B · 31st percentile (134 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 30th percentile (3,522 lb)B · 28th percentile (3,400 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 34th percentile (125 in)B · 44th percentile (132 in)
A · Farmall 50B · 771Median Utility Tractor