Head to head · Utility
Ford 771 vs New Holland Boomer 3050
New HollandModel B
New Holland Boomer 3050
Utility
- power
- 50 hp
- displacement
- 135 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
FordFord 771
vs
New HollandNew Holland Boomer 3050
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Boomer 3050 higher · +1.6 hp (+3%)77148.4 hp
Boomer 305050 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
771 is in the 43rd percentile; Boomer 3050 is in the 45th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Boomer 3050 higher · +1 ci (<1%)771134 ci
Boomer 3050135 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
771 is in the 31st percentile; Boomer 3050 is in the 33rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied7714
Boomer 30504
Median Utility Tractor4
771 is in the 50th percentile; Boomer 3050 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ Boomer 3050 higher · +97 lb (+3%)7713,400 lb
Boomer 30503,497 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
771 is in the 28th percentile; Boomer 3050 is in the 29th · 5,107 models
771 (A)Boomer 3050 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Ford 771 | New Holland Boomer 3050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | New Holland | — |
| Model | 771 | Boomer 3050 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Ford 771 | New Holland Boomer 3050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Ford | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | N844L | — |
| Power Output | 48.4hp | 50hp | ▲ Boomer 3050+1.6 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,800RPM | ▲ Boomer 3050+600 RPM · +27% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 134ci | 135ci | ▲ Boomer 3050+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.6in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Ford 771 | New Holland Boomer 3050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Ford 771 | New Holland Boomer 3050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 132in | 122in | ▲ 771+10 in · +8% |
| Width | Not recorded | 68.3in | — |
| Height | 65.1in | 97.4in | ▲ Boomer 3050+32.3 in · +50% |
| Operating Weight | 3,400lb | 3,497lb | ▲ Boomer 3050+97 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Ford 771 | New Holland Boomer 3050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Ford 771 | New Holland Boomer 3050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Ford 771 | New Holland Boomer 3050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power assist | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Ford 771 | New Holland Boomer 3050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Ford 771 | New Holland Boomer 3050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Ford 771 | New Holland Boomer 3050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 43rd percentile (48.4 hp)B · 45th percentile (50 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 31st percentile (134 ci)B · 33rd percentile (135 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 28th percentile (3,400 lb)B · 29th percentile (3,497 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 44th percentile (132 in)B · 30th percentile (122 in)
A · 771B · Boomer 3050Median Utility Tractor