CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 75A
Utility
- power
- 74 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 75A vs Claas Elios 210
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B
Claas Elios 210
Utility
- power
- 72 hp
- displacement
- 195 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 75A
vs
ClaasClaas Elios 210
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall 75A higher · +2 hp (+3%)Farmall 75A74 hp
Elios 21072 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 75A is in the 66th percentile; Elios 210 is in the 65th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedFarmall 75A195 ci
Elios 210195 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 75A is in the 52nd percentile; Elios 210 is in the 52nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 75A4
Elios 2104
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 75A is in the 50th percentile; Elios 210 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Farmall 75A (A)Elios 210 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Claas Elios 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Claas | — |
| Model | Farmall 75A | Elios 210 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Claas Elios 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | FPT | Same |
| Power Output | 74hp | 72hp | ▲ Farmall 75A+2 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 195ci | 195ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Claas Elios 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 8-speed partially synchronized | Mechanical Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Claas Elios 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 78.4in | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Claas Elios 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Claas Elios 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Claas Elios 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Claas Elios 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 75A | Claas Elios 210 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.1gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 66th percentile (74 hp)B · 65th percentile (72 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 52nd percentile (195 ci)B · 52nd percentile (195 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
A · Farmall 75AB · Elios 210Median Utility Tractor