Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 90
Utility
- power
- 84 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 90 vs Challenger MT975E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT975E
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 600 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 90
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT975E higher · +516 hp (+614%)Farmall 9084 hp
MT975E600 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 90 is in the 74th percentile; MT975E is in the 99th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT975E higher · +751 ci (+274%)Farmall 90274 ci
MT975E1,025 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 90 is in the 79th percentile; MT975E is in the 99th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT975E higher · +8 (+200%)Farmall 904
MT975E12
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; MT975E is in the 99th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT975E higher · +4 (+33%)Farmall 9012
MT975E16
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 90 is in the 50th percentile; MT975E is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Farmall 90 (A)MT975E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Farmall 90 | MT975E | — |
| Category | Utility | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Turk Tractor | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | FPT | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 84hp | 600hp | ▲ MT975E+516 hp · +614% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 1,900RPM | ▲ Farmall 90+400 RPM · +21% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 12 | ▲ MT975E+8 · +200% |
| Displacement | 274ci | 1,025ci | ▲ MT975E+751 ci · +274% |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 101in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 5,702lb | 47,500lb | ▲ MT975E+41,798 lb · +733% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 42x27.95 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 42x27.95 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2-Wheel Drive | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power Steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 90 | Challenger MT975E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 74th percentile (84 hp)B · 99th percentile (600 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,025 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 99th percentile (12)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 54th percentile (5,702 lb)B · 99th percentile (47,500 lb)
A · Farmall 90B · MT975EMedian Utility Tractor