Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT856 vs Challenger MT975E

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT856

Agricultural

power
557 hp
displacement
934 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT856 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT975E

Four-Wheel Drive

power
600 hp
displacement
1,025 ci
Cylinders
12
Forward gears
16
Full MT975E specs
ChallengerChallenger MT856
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975E

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 971–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT975E higher · +43 hp (+8%)
MT856557 hp
MT975E600 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT856 is in the 99th percentile; MT975E is in the 99th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT975E higher · +91 ci (+10%)
MT856934 ci
MT975E1,025 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT856 is in the 98th percentile; MT975E is in the 98th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

▲ MT975E higher · +6 (+100%)
MT8566
MT975E12
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT856 is in the 74th percentile; MT975E is in the 99th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT975E higher · +5,500 lb (+13%)
MT85642,000 lb
MT975E47,500 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT856 is in the 98th percentile; MT975E is in the 99th · 971 models

MT856 (A)MT975E (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT856Challenger MT975EDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT856MT975E—
CategoryAgriculturalFour-Wheel Drive—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT856Challenger MT975EDifference
ManufacturerMANAGCO Power—
ModelD3876Not recorded—
Power Output557hp600hp▲ MT975E+43 hp · +8%
Rated RPM1,730RPM1,900RPM▲ MT975E+170 RPM · +10%
Cylinders612▲ MT975E+6 · +100%
Displacement934ci1,025ci▲ MT975E+91 ci · +10%
Bore5.4inNot recorded—
Stroke6.7inNot recorded—

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT856Challenger MT975EDifference
TypeContinuously-variable transmissionPower Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT856Challenger MT975EDifference
Length266inNot recorded—
Width116inNot recorded—
Height148inNot recorded—
Operating Weight42,000lb47,500lb▲ MT975E+5,500 lb · +13%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT856Challenger MT975EDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedClosed Center Pressure-Flow CompensatedSame

Tires

SpecChallenger MT856Challenger MT975EDifference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded42x27.95—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded42x27.95—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT856Challenger MT975EDifference
Chassis TypeCrawlerNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT856Challenger MT975EDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 99th percentile (557 hp)B · 99th percentile (600 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 98th percentile (934 ci)B · 98th percentile (1,025 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (12)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 98th percentile (42,000 lb)B · 99th percentile (47,500 lb)
A · MT856B · MT975EMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT856Full spec pageChallenger MT975E