Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 95
Utility
- power
- 90 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 95 vs CaseIH MX90C
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH MX90C
Utility
- power
- 90 hp
- displacement
- 244 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 95
vs
CaseIHCaseIH MX90C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedFarmall 9590 hp
MX90C90 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 95 is in the 78th percentile; MX90C is in the 78th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Farmall 95 higher · +30 ci (+12%)Farmall 95274 ci
MX90C244 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 95 is in the 79th percentile; MX90C is in the 68th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 954
MX90C4
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 95 is in the 50th percentile; MX90C is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MX90C higher · +4 (+33%)Farmall 9512
MX90C16
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 95 is in the 50th percentile; MX90C is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Farmall 95 (A)MX90C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | CaseIH MX90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | Farmall 95 | MX90C | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | CaseIH MX90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Perkins | — |
| Power Output | 90hp | 90hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ Farmall 95+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 244ci | ▲ Farmall 95+30 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.9in | ▲ Farmall 95+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Farmall 95+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | CaseIH MX90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | 16-speed partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | CaseIH MX90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 171in | — |
| Height | 101in | 110in | ▲ MX90C+9 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 6,107lb | 11,200lb | ▲ MX90C+5,093 lb · +83% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | CaseIH MX90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Closed center pressure-flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | CaseIH MX90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type 2 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | CaseIH MX90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet discs | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | CaseIH MX90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | CaseIH MX90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 4.2gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | CaseIH MX90C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 78th percentile (90 hp)B · 78th percentile (90 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 68th percentile (244 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 58th percentile (6,107 lb)B · 89th percentile (11,200 lb)
A · Farmall 95B · MX90CMedian Utility Tractor