Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 95
Utility
- power
- 90 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 95 vs New Holland T4050V
New HollandModel B
New Holland T4050V
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 95
vs
New HollandNew Holland T4050V
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T4050V higher · +5 hp (+6%)Farmall 9590 hp
T4050V95 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 95 is in the 78th percentile; T4050V is in the 81st · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedFarmall 95274 ci
T4050V274 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 95 is in the 79th percentile; T4050V is in the 79th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall 954
T4050V4
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 95 is in the 50th percentile; T4050V is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ T4050V higher · +4 (+33%)Farmall 9512
T4050V16
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 95 is in the 50th percentile; T4050V is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
Farmall 95 (A)T4050V (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | New Holland T4050V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Farmall 95 | T4050V | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | New Holland T4050V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | New Holland | — |
| Model | Not recorded | NEF | — |
| Power Output | 90hp | 95hp | ▲ T4050V+5 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ Farmall 95+200 RPM · +9% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 274ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.2in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | New Holland T4050V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 12-speed mechanical shuttle | Synchro Command | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | New Holland T4050V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 42.5in | — |
| Height | 101in | 84.6in | ▲ Farmall 95+16.4 in · +19% |
| Operating Weight | 6,107lb | 5,307lb | ▲ Farmall 95+800 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | New Holland T4050V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | New Holland T4050V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type 2 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | New Holland T4050V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | New Holland T4050V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95 | New Holland T4050V | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 78th percentile (90 hp)B · 81st percentile (95 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 79th percentile (274 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 50th percentile (12)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 58th percentile (6,107 lb)B · 50th percentile (5,307 lb)
A · Farmall 95B · T4050VMedian Utility Tractor