Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall 95C
Utility
- power
- 95 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall 95C vs Challenger 65C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall 95C
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 65C higher · +190 hp (+200%)Farmall 95C95 hp
65C285 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall 95C is in the 81st percentile; 65C is in the 96th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65C higher · +364 ci (+133%)Farmall 95C274 ci
65C638 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall 95C is in the 79th percentile; 65C is in the 95th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 65C higher · +2 (+50%)Farmall 95C4
65C6
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall 95C is in the 50th percentile; 65C is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Farmall 95C higher · +6 (+60%)Farmall 95C16
65C10
Median Utility Tractor12
Farmall 95C is in the 73rd percentile; 65C is in the 39th · 4,941 models
Farmall 95C (A)65C (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Farmall 95C | 65C | — |
| Category | Utility | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat Powertrain Technologies (FPT) | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3306 DITA | — |
| Power Output | 95hp | 285hp | ▲ 65C+190 hp · +200% |
| Rated RPM | 2,300RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Farmall 95C+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 65C+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 274ci | 638ci | ▲ 65C+364 ci · +133% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.8in | ▲ 65C+0.7 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 6in | ▲ 65C+0.8 in · +15% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 16-speed mechanical shuttle | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 232in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 120in | — |
| Height | 77.8in | 128in | ▲ 65C+50.2 in · +65% |
| Operating Weight | 7,180lb | 32,875lb | ▲ 65C+25,695 lb · +358% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | III/IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four-wheel drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall 95C | Challenger 65C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 11gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 81st percentile (95 hp)B · 96th percentile (285 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 95th percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 69th percentile (7,180 lb)B · 98th percentile (32,875 lb)
A · Farmall 95CB · 65CMedian Utility Tractor