Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Farmall DX18E
Utility
- power
- 18 hp
- displacement
- 58.2 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Farmall DX18E vs Mitsubishi GS180
MitsubishiModel B
Mitsubishi GS180
Utility
- power
- 17.7 hp
- displacement
- 68.7 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
CaseIHCaseIH Farmall DX18E
vs
MitsubishiMitsubishi GS180
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Farmall DX18E higher · +0.3 hp (+2%)Farmall DX18E18 hp
GS18017.7 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Farmall DX18E is in the 6th percentile; GS180 is in the 5th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ GS180 higher · +10.5 ci (+18%)Farmall DX18E58.2 ci
GS18068.7 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Farmall DX18E is in the 5th percentile; GS180 is in the 9th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedFarmall DX18E3
GS1803
Median Utility Tractor4
Farmall DX18E is in the 23rd percentile; GS180 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ GS180 higher · +505 lb (+38%)Farmall DX18E1,314 lb
GS1801,819 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Farmall DX18E is in the 3rd percentile; GS180 is in the 10th · 5,107 models
Farmall DX18E (A)GS180 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi GS180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | Farmall DX18E | GS180 | — |
| Category | Utility, Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi GS180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Shibaura | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | ISM-S753 | S3L | — |
| Power Output | 18hp | 17.7hp | ▲ Farmall DX18E+0.3 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 3,000RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ Farmall DX18E+500 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 58.2ci | 68.7ci | ▲ GS180+10.5 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 3in | 3.1in | ▲ GS180+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 2.8in | 3.1in | ▲ GS180+0.3 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi GS180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi GS180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 104in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 43.1in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 74.8in | — |
| Operating Weight | 1,314lb | 1,819lb | ▲ GS180+505 lb · +38% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi GS180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi GS180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | JIS0 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi GS180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Farmall DX18E | Mitsubishi GS180 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 6th percentile (18 hp)B · 5th percentile (17.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 5th percentile (58.2 ci)B · 9th percentile (68.7 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 3rd percentile (1,314 lb)B · 10th percentile (1,819 lb)
A · Farmall DX18EB · GS180Median Utility Tractor