CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 245
Row Crop
- power
- 248 hp
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 23
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 245 vs Challenger MT645C
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT645C
Utility
- power
- 242 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 245
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT645C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Magnum 245 higher · +6 hp (+2%)Magnum 245248 hp
MT645C242 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 245 is in the 87th percentile; MT645C is in the 86th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT645C higher · +8 ci (+2%)Magnum 245505 ci
MT645C513 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 245 is in the 87th percentile; MT645C is in the 92nd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMagnum 2456
MT645C6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 245 is in the 50th percentile; MT645C is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT645C higher · +4,785 lb (+23%)Magnum 24521,010 lb
MT645C25,795 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Magnum 245 is in the 86th percentile; MT645C is in the 95th · 1,350 models
Magnum 245 (A)MT645C (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 245 | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Magnum 245 | MT645C | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 245 | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | AGCO | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Sisu Diesel (Serial No. T00767) | — |
| Power Output | 248hp | 242hp | ▲ Magnum 245+6 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT645C+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 513ci | ▲ MT645C+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.4in | ▲ Magnum 245+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.7in | ▲ MT645C+0.4 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 245 | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full powershift | Continuously variable transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 245 | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 223in | — |
| Height | 129in | 133in | ▲ MT645C+4 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 21,010lb | 25,795lb | ▲ MT645C+4,785 lb · +23% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 245 | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | PFC | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 245 | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IIIN | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 26,460lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 245 | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Four-Wheel Drive (4WD) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 245 | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 245 | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 245 | Challenger MT645C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 87th percentile (248 hp)B · 86th percentile (242 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 92nd percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 86th percentile (21,010 lb)B · 95th percentile (25,795 lb)
Height
median 114 inA · 88th percentile (129 in)B · 93rd percentile (133 in)
A · Magnum 245B · MT645CMedian Row Crop Tractor