CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 275
Row Crop
- power
- 275 hp
- displacement
- 540 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 23
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 275 vs Challenger 65B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 65B
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 275
vs
ChallengerChallenger 65B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 65B higher · +10 hp (+4%)Magnum 275275 hp
65B285 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 275 is in the 91st percentile; 65B is in the 92nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 65B higher · +98 ci (+18%)Magnum 275540 ci
65B638 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 275 is in the 95th percentile; 65B is in the 98th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMagnum 2756
65B6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 275 is in the 50th percentile; 65B is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Magnum 275 higher · +13 (+130%)Magnum 27523
65B10
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Magnum 275 is in the 74th percentile; 65B is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
Magnum 275 (A)65B (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 275 | Challenger 65B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Magnum 275 | 65B | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 275 | Challenger 65B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | 8.9L 6-cyl diesel | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 275hp | 285hp | ▲ 65B+10 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 65B+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 540ci | 638ci | ▲ 65B+98 ci · +18% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.8in | ▲ 65B+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 6in | ▲ 65B+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 275 | Challenger 65B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full powershift | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 275 | Challenger 65B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 107in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 24.5in | — |
| Height | 129in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 21,570lb | 34,030lb | ▲ 65B+12,460 lb · +58% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 275 | Challenger 65B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | PFC | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 275 | Challenger 65B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IIIN | III/IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 275 | Challenger 65B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 275 | Challenger 65B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 275 | Challenger 65B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.5gal | 11gal | ▲ 65B+4.5 gal · +69% |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 275 | Challenger 65B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 91st percentile (275 hp)B · 92nd percentile (285 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 95th percentile (540 ci)B · 98th percentile (638 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 74th percentile (23)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 88th percentile (21,570 lb)B · 99th percentile (34,030 lb)
A · Magnum 275B · 65BMedian Row Crop Tractor