CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 310
Row Crop
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 542 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 310 vs Challenger MT755D
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT755D
Agricultural
- power
- 318 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 310
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT755D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ MT755D higher · +8 hp (+3%)Magnum 310310 hp
MT755D318 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 310 is in the 94th percentile; MT755D is in the 95th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Magnum 310 higher · +29 ci (+6%)Magnum 310542 ci
MT755D513 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 310 is in the 95th percentile; MT755D is in the 92nd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMagnum 3106
MT755D6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 310 is in the 50th percentile; MT755D is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Magnum 310 higher · +3 (+19%)Magnum 31019
MT755D16
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Magnum 310 is in the 68th percentile; MT755D is in the 50th · 1,200 models
Magnum 310 (A)MT755D (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Magnum 310 | MT755D | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural, Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | AGCO POWER | — |
| Power Output | 310hp | 318hp | ▲ MT755D+8 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 542ci | 513ci | ▲ Magnum 310+29 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.4in | ▲ Magnum 310+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift, Creeper | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 234in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 100in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 129in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 20,670lb | 31,520lb | ▲ MT755D+10,850 lb · +52% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure Flow Compensating | Closed-center Pressure-flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Electro-hydraulic Differential | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | 3 | III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Electro-hydraulic Differential | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 Volts Electric Starter | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 94th percentile (310 hp)B · 95th percentile (318 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 95th percentile (542 ci)B · 92nd percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 68th percentile (19)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 86th percentile (20,670 lb)B · 98th percentile (31,520 lb)
A · Magnum 310B · MT755DMedian Row Crop Tractor