CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 310
Row Crop
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 542 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 310 vs New Holland T7.315
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T7.315
Row Crop
- power
- 313 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 310
vs
New HollandNew Holland T7.315
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ T7.315 higher · +3 hp (<1%)Magnum 310310 hp
T7.315313 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 310 is in the 94th percentile; T7.315 is in the 94th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Magnum 310 higher · +131 ci (+32%)Magnum 310542 ci
T7.315411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 310 is in the 95th percentile; T7.315 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMagnum 3106
T7.3156
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 310 is in the 50th percentile; T7.315 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ T7.315 higher · +2,037 lb (+10%)Magnum 31020,670 lb
T7.31522,707 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Magnum 310 is in the 86th percentile; T7.315 is in the 90th · 1,350 models
Magnum 310 (A)T7.315 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Magnum 310 | T7.315 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | FPT | — |
| Power Output | 310hp | 313hp | ▲ T7.315+3 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ T7.315+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 542ci | 411ci | ▲ Magnum 310+131 ci · +32% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.1in | ▲ Magnum 310+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.2in | ▲ Magnum 310+0.5 in · +10% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift, Creeper | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 234in | 208in | ▲ Magnum 310+26 in · +13% |
| Width | 100in | 98in | ▲ Magnum 310+2 in · +2% |
| Height | 129in | 133in | ▲ T7.315+4 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 20,670lb | 22,707lb | ▲ T7.315+2,037 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure Flow Compensating | Closed center load-sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IVN | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | 3 | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective catalytic reduction | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 310 | New Holland T7.315 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 94th percentile (310 hp)B · 94th percentile (313 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 95th percentile (542 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 86th percentile (20,670 lb)B · 90th percentile (22,707 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 94th percentile (234 in)B · 83rd percentile (208 in)
A · Magnum 310B · T7.315Median Row Crop Tractor