Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 335
Row Crop
- power
- 330 hp
- displacement
- 542 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 335 vs Challenger 75C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 75C
Articulated
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 335
vs
ChallengerChallenger 75C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Magnum 335 higher · +5 hp (+2%)Magnum 335330 hp
75C325 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 335 is in the 95th percentile; 75C is in the 95th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 75C higher · +87 ci (+16%)Magnum 335542 ci
75C629 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 335 is in the 95th percentile; 75C is in the 98th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMagnum 3356
75C6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 335 is in the 50th percentile; 75C is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Magnum 335 higher · +9 (+90%)Magnum 33519
75C10
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Magnum 335 is in the 68th percentile; 75C is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
Magnum 335 (A)75C (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Magnum 335 | 75C | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH/CDC | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3176 ATAAC | — |
| Power Output | 330hp | 325hp | ▲ Magnum 335+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 75C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 542ci | 629ci | ▲ 75C+87 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.9in | ▲ 75C+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.5in | ▲ Magnum 335+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Powershift | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 234in | 232in | ▲ Magnum 335+2 in · <1% |
| Width | 100in | 120in | ▲ 75C+20 in · +20% |
| Height | 129in | 144in | ▲ 75C+15 in · +12% |
| Operating Weight | 21,350lb | 33,305lb | ▲ 75C+11,955 lb · +56% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure Flow Compensating | Closed Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydraulic | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Rear 1000 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | IVN/III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydraulic | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.5gal | 15gal | ▲ 75C+8.5 gal · +131% |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 95th percentile (330 hp)B · 95th percentile (325 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 95th percentile (542 ci)B · 98th percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 68th percentile (19)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 87th percentile (21,350 lb)B · 99th percentile (33,305 lb)
A · Magnum 335B · 75CMedian Row Crop Tractor