ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75C
Articulated
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger 75C vs John Deere 9460RT
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 9460RT
Crawler
- power
- 460 hp
- displacement
- 827 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger 75C
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 9460RT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ 9460RT higher · +135 hp (+42%)75C325 hp
9460RT460 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
75C is in the 13th percentile; 9460RT is in the 55th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9460RT higher · +198 ci (+31%)75C629 ci
9460RT827 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
75C is in the 13th percentile; 9460RT is in the 49th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied75C6
9460RT6
Median Articulated Tractor6
75C is in the 50th percentile; 9460RT is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9460RT higher · +8 (+80%)75C10
9460RT18
Median Articulated Tractor16
75C is in the 3rd percentile; 9460RT is in the 97th · 59 models
75C (A)9460RT (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75C | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | 75C | 9460RT | — |
| Category | Articulated | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75C | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | 3176 ATAAC | PowerTech PSX | — |
| Power Output | 325hp | 460hp | ▲ 9460RT+135 hp · +42% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 827ci | ▲ 9460RT+198 ci · +31% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 5.2in | ▲ 9460RT+0.3 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 6.5in | ▲ 9460RT+1 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75C | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75C | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 237in | ▲ 9460RT+5 in · +2% |
| Width | 120in | 136in | ▲ 9460RT+16 in · +13% |
| Height | 144in | 134in | ▲ 75C+10 in · +7% |
| Operating Weight | 33,305lb | 47,020lb | ▲ 9460RT+13,715 lb · +41% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75C | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Closed center pressure flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Electro-hydraulic differential | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 75C | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear 1000 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75C | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 4N/4 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75C | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Electro-hydraulic differential | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75C | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75C | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | 14.6gal | ▲ 75C+0.4 gal · +3% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 75C | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 13th percentile (325 hp)B · 55th percentile (460 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 13th percentile (629 ci)B · 49th percentile (827 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 3rd percentile (10)B · 97th percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 8th percentile (33,305 lb)B · 38th percentile (47,020 lb)
A · 75CB · 9460RTMedian Articulated Tractor