Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 335
Row Crop
- power
- 330 hp
- displacement
- 542 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 335 vs Challenger 75E
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 75E
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 335
vs
ChallengerChallenger 75E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 75E higher · +10 hp (+3%)Magnum 335330 hp
75E340 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 335 is in the 95th percentile; 75E is in the 96th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 75E higher · +87 ci (+16%)Magnum 335542 ci
75E629 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 335 is in the 95th percentile; 75E is in the 98th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMagnum 3356
75E6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 335 is in the 50th percentile; 75E is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Magnum 335 higher · +9 (+90%)Magnum 33519
75E10
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Magnum 335 is in the 68th percentile; 75E is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
Magnum 335 (A)75E (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Magnum 335 | 75E | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH/CDC | Caterpillar | — |
| Power Output | 330hp | 340hp | ▲ 75E+10 hp · +3% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 75E+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 542ci | 629ci | ▲ 75E+87 ci · +16% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.9in | ▲ 75E+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.5in | ▲ Magnum 335+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Powershift | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 234in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 100in | 25in | ▲ Magnum 335+75 in · +300% |
| Height | 129in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 21,350lb | 34,800lb | ▲ 75E+13,450 lb · +63% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure Flow Compensating | Closed | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | IVN/III | III, IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.5gal | 15gal | ▲ 75E+8.5 gal · +131% |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Challenger 75E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 95th percentile (330 hp)B · 96th percentile (340 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 95th percentile (542 ci)B · 98th percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 68th percentile (19)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 87th percentile (21,350 lb)B · 99th percentile (34,800 lb)
A · Magnum 335B · 75EMedian Row Crop Tractor