ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75E
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 75E vs John Deere 9460RT
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 9460RT
Crawler
- power
- 460 hp
- displacement
- 827 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger 75E
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 9460RT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 9460RT higher · +120 hp (+35%)75E340 hp
9460RT460 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
75E is in the 96th percentile; 9460RT is in the 98th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9460RT higher · +198 ci (+31%)75E629 ci
9460RT827 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
75E is in the 93rd percentile; 9460RT is in the 96th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied75E6
9460RT6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
75E is in the 74th percentile; 9460RT is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9460RT higher · +8 (+80%)75E10
9460RT18
Median Agricultural Tractor16
75E is in the 23rd percentile; 9460RT is in the 68th · 972 models
75E (A)9460RT (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75E | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | 75E | 9460RT | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75E | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | PowerTech PSX | — |
| Power Output | 340hp | 460hp | ▲ 9460RT+120 hp · +35% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 827ci | ▲ 9460RT+198 ci · +31% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 5.2in | ▲ 9460RT+0.3 in · +6% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 6.5in | ▲ 9460RT+1 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75E | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75E | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 237in | — |
| Width | 25in | 136in | ▲ 9460RT+111 in · +444% |
| Height | Not recorded | 134in | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,800lb | 47,020lb | ▲ 9460RT+12,220 lb · +35% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75E | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Closed center pressure flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Electro-hydraulic differential | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75E | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III, IV | Category 4N/4 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75E | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Electro-hydraulic differential | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75E | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75E | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | 14.6gal | ▲ 75E+0.4 gal · +3% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 75E | John Deere 9460RT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 96th percentile (340 hp)B · 98th percentile (460 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (629 ci)B · 96th percentile (827 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 23rd percentile (10)B · 68th percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (34,800 lb)B · 99th percentile (47,020 lb)
A · 75EB · 9460RTMedian Agricultural Tractor