Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Magnum 335
Row Crop
- power
- 330 hp
- displacement
- 542 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Magnum 335 vs Claas Xerion 3300
ClaasModel B
Claas Xerion 3300
Utility
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 335
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 3300
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Xerion 3300 higher · +5 hp (+2%)Magnum 335330 hp
Xerion 3300335 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Magnum 335 is in the 95th percentile; Xerion 3300 is in the 95th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Magnum 335 higher · +5 ci (<1%)Magnum 335542 ci
Xerion 3300537 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Magnum 335 is in the 95th percentile; Xerion 3300 is in the 94th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMagnum 3356
Xerion 33006
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Magnum 335 is in the 50th percentile; Xerion 3300 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Xerion 3300 higher · +7,310 lb (+34%)Magnum 33521,350 lb
Xerion 330028,660 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Magnum 335 is in the 87th percentile; Xerion 3300 is in the 97th · 1,350 models
Magnum 335 (A)Xerion 3300 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Claas | — |
| Model | Magnum 335 | Xerion 3300 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH/CDC | Caterpillar | — |
| Power Output | 330hp | 335hp | ▲ Xerion 3300+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Xerion 3300+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 542ci | 537ci | ▲ Magnum 335+5 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Powershift | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 234in | 261in | ▲ Xerion 3300+27 in · +12% |
| Width | 100in | 98in | ▲ Magnum 335+2 in · +2% |
| Height | 129in | 147in | ▲ Xerion 3300+18 in · +14% |
| Operating Weight | 21,350lb | 28,660lb | ▲ Xerion 3300+7,310 lb · +34% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure Flow Compensating | Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Four-wheel steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | IVN/III | III N | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Four-wheel steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 6.5gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Magnum 335 | Claas Xerion 3300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 95th percentile (330 hp)B · 95th percentile (335 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 95th percentile (542 ci)B · 94th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 87th percentile (21,350 lb)B · 97th percentile (28,660 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 94th percentile (234 in)B · 98th percentile (261 in)
A · Magnum 335B · Xerion 3300Median Row Crop Tractor