Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Magnum 335 vs Claas Xerion 3300 Trac

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Magnum 335

Row Crop

power
330 hp
displacement
542 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
19
Full Magnum 335 specs
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B

Claas Xerion 3300 Trac

Agricultural

power
335 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full Xerion 3300 Trac specs
CaseIHCaseIH Magnum 335
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 3300 Trac

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,1401,417

Engine Power

▲ Xerion 3300 Trac higher · +5 hp (+2%)
Magnum 335330 hp
Xerion 3300 Trac335 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Magnum 335 is in the 95th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 95th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Magnum 335 higher · +5 ci (<1%)
Magnum 335542 ci
Xerion 3300 Trac537 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Magnum 335 is in the 95th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 94th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Magnum 3356
Xerion 3300 Trac6
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Magnum 335 is in the 50th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Operating Weight

▲ Xerion 3300 Trac higher · +1,141 lb (+5%)
Magnum 33521,350 lb
Xerion 3300 Trac22,491 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

Magnum 335 is in the 87th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 89th · 1,350 models

Magnum 335 (A)Xerion 3300 Trac (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Magnum 335Claas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHClaas
ModelMagnum 335Xerion 3300 Trac
CategoryRow CropAgricultural

Engine

SpecCaseIH Magnum 335Claas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
ManufacturerCNH/CDCCaterpillar
ModelNot recordedC9
Power Output330hp335hpXerion 3300 Trac+5 hp · +2%
Rated RPM2,000RPM1,700RPMMagnum 335+300 RPM · +18%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement542ci537ciMagnum 335+5 ci · <1%
Bore4.5in4.4inMagnum 335+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.7in5.9inXerion 3300 Trac+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Magnum 335Claas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
TypeFull PowershiftHydrostatic

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Magnum 335Claas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
Length234in261inXerion 3300 Trac+27 in · +12%
Width100inNot recorded
Height129in147inXerion 3300 Trac+18 in · +14%
Operating Weight21,350lb22,491lbXerion 3300 Trac+1,141 lb · +5%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Magnum 335Claas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
System TypePressure Flow CompensatingNot recorded
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Magnum 335Claas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
Hitch CategoryIVN/IIINot recorded
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Magnum 335Claas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 4WD
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Magnum 335Claas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Magnum 335Claas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
Coolant6.5galNot recorded

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Magnum 335Claas Xerion 3300 TracDifference
TypeCabNot recorded

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 95th percentile (330 hp)B · 95th percentile (335 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 95th percentile (542 ci)B · 94th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 87th percentile (21,350 lb)B · 89th percentile (22,491 lb)

Length

median 180 in
A · 94th percentile (234 in)B · 98th percentile (261 in)
A · Magnum 335B · Xerion 3300 TracMedian Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Magnum 335Full spec pageClaas Xerion 3300 Trac