Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Maxxum 145
Utility
- power
- 145 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Maxxum 145 vs Challenger MT535B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT535B
Utility
- power
- 146 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Maxxum 145
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT535B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT535B higher · +1 hp (<1%)Maxxum 145145 hp
MT535B146 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Maxxum 145 is in the 93rd percentile; MT535B is in the 93rd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT535B higher · +128 ci (+47%)Maxxum 145274 ci
MT535B402 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Maxxum 145 is in the 79th percentile; MT535B is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT535B higher · +2 (+50%)Maxxum 1454
MT535B6
Median Utility Tractor4
Maxxum 145 is in the 50th percentile; MT535B is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT535B higher · +2,776 lb (+23%)Maxxum 14512,004 lb
MT535B14,780 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
Maxxum 145 is in the 90th percentile; MT535B is in the 93rd · 5,107 models
Maxxum 145 (A)MT535B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 145 | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Maxxum 145 | MT535B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 145 | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | Perkins Diesel, Serial No. U004188P | — |
| Power Output | 145hp | 146hp | ▲ MT535B+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MT535B+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 274ci | 402ci | ▲ MT535B+128 ci · +47% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Maxxum 145+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 145 | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial power shift | Continuously variable transmission (AGCO CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 145 | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 176in | 169in | ▲ Maxxum 145+7 in · +4% |
| Width | 98in | 81.1in | ▲ Maxxum 145+16.9 in · +21% |
| Height | 80in | 113in | ▲ MT535B+33 in · +41% |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 107in | — |
| Operating Weight | 12,004lb | 14,780lb | ▲ MT535B+2,776 lb · +23% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 145 | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 145 | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II | Category II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 145 | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 articulated | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Multiple wet disc hydraulically operated by two-foot pedals | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 145 | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volt electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Maxxum 145 | Challenger MT535B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.7gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 93rd percentile (145 hp)B · 93rd percentile (146 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 79th percentile (274 ci)B · 90th percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 90th percentile (12,004 lb)B · 93rd percentile (14,780 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 89th percentile (176 in)B · 85th percentile (169 in)
A · Maxxum 145B · MT535BMedian Utility Tractor