Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH MX200 Magnum vs Challenger MT655

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT655

Row Crop

power
Not recorded
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full MT655 specs
CaseIHCaseIH MX200 Magnum
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT655

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Displacement

▲ MT655 higher · +8 ci (+2%)
MX200 Magnum505 ci
MT655513 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

MX200 Magnum is in the 87th percentile; MT655 is in the 92nd · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MX200 Magnum6
MT6556
Median Row Crop Tractor6

MX200 Magnum is in the 50th percentile; MT655 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MX200 Magnum18
MT65518
Median Row Crop Tractor16

MX200 Magnum is in the 61st percentile; MT655 is in the 61st · 1,200 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT655 higher · +1,840 lb (+9%)
MX200 Magnum19,660 lb
MT65521,500 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

MX200 Magnum is in the 83rd percentile; MT655 is in the 87th · 1,350 models

MX200 Magnum (A)MT655 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH MX200 MagnumChallenger MT655Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHChallenger—
ModelMX200 MagnumMT655—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH MX200 MagnumChallenger MT655Difference
ManufacturerCDCSisu—
Rated RPM2,000RPM2,200RPM▲ MT655+200 RPM · +10%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement505ci513ci▲ MT655+8 ci · +2%
Bore4.5in4.4in▲ MX200 Magnum+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.3in5.7in▲ MT655+0.4 in · +8%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH MX200 MagnumChallenger MT655Difference
TypeFull power shiftPower shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH MX200 MagnumChallenger MT655Difference
LengthNot recorded203in—
WidthNot recorded98.2in—
HeightNot recorded121in—
Operating Weight19,660lb21,500lb▲ MT655+1,840 lb · +9%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH MX200 MagnumChallenger MT655Difference
System TypePFCClosed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC)—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Tires

SpecCaseIH MX200 MagnumChallenger MT655Difference
Front Tire Size11.00-24Not recorded—
Rear Tire Size18.4R46Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH MX200 MagnumChallenger MT655Difference
Hitch CategoryIII, IIINIII—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH MX200 MagnumChallenger MT655Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive Type2WD4WD—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecCaseIH MX200 MagnumChallenger MT655Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectric Start—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH MX200 MagnumChallenger MT655Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 92nd percentile (513 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 83rd percentile (19,660 lb)B · 87th percentile (21,500 lb)
A · MX200 MagnumB · MT655Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH MX200 MagnumFull spec pageChallenger MT655