Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH MX210 Magnum vs CaseIH Puma 200

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH MX210 Magnum

Row Crop

power
200 hp
displacement
505 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full MX210 Magnum specs
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B

CaseIH Puma 200

Row Crop

power
200 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 200 specs
CaseIHCaseIH MX210 Magnum
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 200

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
MX210 Magnum200 hp
Puma 200200 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

MX210 Magnum is in the 77th percentile; Puma 200 is in the 77th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MX210 Magnum higher · +94 ci (+23%)
MX210 Magnum505 ci
Puma 200411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

MX210 Magnum is in the 87th percentile; Puma 200 is in the 60th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MX210 Magnum6
Puma 2006
Median Row Crop Tractor6

MX210 Magnum is in the 50th percentile; Puma 200 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MX210 Magnum18
Puma 20018
Median Row Crop Tractor16

MX210 Magnum is in the 61st percentile; Puma 200 is in the 61st · 1,200 models

MX210 Magnum (A)Puma 200 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH MX210 MagnumCaseIH Puma 200Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHCaseIHSame
ModelMX210 MagnumPuma 200—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH MX210 MagnumCaseIH Puma 200Difference
ManufacturerCDCFPT—
Power Output200hp200hpSame
Rated RPM2,000RPM2,200RPM▲ Puma 200+200 RPM · +10%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement505ci411ci▲ MX210 Magnum+94 ci · +23%
Bore4.5in4.1in▲ MX210 Magnum+0.4 in · +10%
Stroke5.3in5.2in▲ MX210 Magnum+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH MX210 MagnumCaseIH Puma 200Difference
TypeFull power shiftFull power shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH MX210 MagnumCaseIH Puma 200Difference
WidthNot recorded60in—
Height125inNot recorded—
Operating WeightNot recorded18,940lb—

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH MX210 MagnumCaseIH Puma 200Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) with parallel priorityClosed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic powerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH MX210 MagnumCaseIH Puma 200Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point Hitch2/3N—
Hitch CategoryIIINot recorded—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH MX210 MagnumCaseIH Puma 200Difference
Chassis Type4x2 2WD4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive Type2WD4WD—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic powerSame
Brake TypeWet discsNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH MX210 MagnumCaseIH Puma 200Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH MX210 MagnumCaseIH Puma 200Difference
StandardNot recordedInterim Tier 4—
Control SystemNot recordedSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)—

Capacities

SpecCaseIH MX210 MagnumCaseIH Puma 200Difference
Coolant6galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH MX210 MagnumCaseIH Puma 200Difference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 77th percentile (200 hp)B · 77th percentile (200 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)
A · MX210 MagnumB · Puma 200Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH MX210 MagnumFull spec pageCaseIH Puma 200