Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH MX240 Magnum
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 505 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH MX240 Magnum vs Challenger MT645
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT645
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
CaseIHCaseIH MX240 Magnum
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT645
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ MX240 Magnum higher · +56 ci (+12%)MX240 Magnum505 ci
MT645449 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
MX240 Magnum is in the 87th percentile; MT645 is in the 77th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMX240 Magnum6
MT6456
Median Row Crop Tractor6
MX240 Magnum is in the 50th percentile; MT645 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMX240 Magnum18
MT64518
Median Row Crop Tractor16
MX240 Magnum is in the 61st percentile; MT645 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ MX240 Magnum higher · +1,725 lb (+9%)MX240 Magnum20,745 lb
MT64519,020 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
MX240 Magnum is in the 86th percentile; MT645 is in the 81st · 1,350 models
MX240 Magnum (A)MT645 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH MX240 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | MX240 Magnum | MT645 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH MX240 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | Sisu/Valmet Diesel | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT645+200 RPM · +10% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 505ci | 449ci | ▲ MX240 Magnum+56 ci · +12% |
| Bore | 4.5in | 4.3in | ▲ MX240 Magnum+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH MX240 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full powershift | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH MX240 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 203in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 98.2in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 121in | — |
| Operating Weight | 20,745lb | 19,020lb | ▲ MX240 Magnum+1,725 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH MX240 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | PFC | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power Steering (Hydrostatic) | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH MX240 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | III | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH MX240 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power Steering (Hydrostatic) | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH MX240 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric, 12 Volts | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH MX240 Magnum | Challenger MT645 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 87th percentile (505 ci)B · 77th percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 86th percentile (20,745 lb)B · 81st percentile (19,020 lb)
A · MX240 MagnumB · MT645Median Row Crop Tractor