CaseIHModel A
CaseIH MXU110
Agricultural
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 274 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Agricultural
CaseIH MXU110 vs Challenger MT465E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT465E
Agricultural
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH MXU110
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT465E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMXU110115 hp
MT465E115 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MXU110 is in the 53rd percentile; MT465E is in the 53rd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT465E higher · +25 ci (+9%)MXU110274 ci
MT465E299 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MXU110 is in the 40th percentile; MT465E is in the 46th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMXU1104
MT465E4
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MXU110 is in the 31st percentile; MT465E is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ MXU110 higher · +8 (+50%)MXU11024
MT465E16
Median Agricultural Tractor16
MXU110 is in the 81st percentile; MT465E is in the 50th · 972 models
MXU110 (A)MT465E (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH MXU110 | Challenger MT465E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | MXU110 | MT465E | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH MXU110 | Challenger MT465E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 115hp | 115hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MXU110+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 274ci | 299ci | ▲ MT465E+25 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ MT465E+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.3in | ▲ MT465E+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH MXU110 | Challenger MT465E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial powershift | Four-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH MXU110 | Challenger MT465E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 72in | — |
| Operating Weight | 9,568lb | 15,432lb | ▲ MT465E+5,864 lb · +61% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH MXU110 | Challenger MT465E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH MXU110 | Challenger MT465E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | II | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH MXU110 | Challenger MT465E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH MXU110 | Challenger MT465E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH MXU110 | Challenger MT465E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 53rd percentile (115 hp)B · 53rd percentile (115 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 40th percentile (274 ci)B · 46th percentile (299 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 31st percentile (4)B · 31st percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 81st percentile (24)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 42nd percentile (9,568 lb)B · 72nd percentile (15,432 lb)
A · MXU110B · MT465EMedian Agricultural Tractor