CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 115
Utility
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Utility
CaseIH Puma 115 vs Massey Ferguson 5712SL
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 5712SL
Utility
- power
- 115 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 115
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 5712SL
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 115115 hp
5712SL115 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Puma 115 is in the 88th percentile; 5712SL is in the 88th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 115 higher · +142 ci (+53%)Puma 115411 ci
5712SL269 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Puma 115 is in the 91st percentile; 5712SL is in the 77th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Puma 115 higher · +2 (+50%)Puma 1156
5712SL4
Median Utility Tractor4
Puma 115 is in the 93rd percentile; 5712SL is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5712SL higher · +6 (+33%)Puma 11518
5712SL24
Median Utility Tractor12
Puma 115 is in the 83rd percentile; 5712SL is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
Puma 115 (A)5712SL (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Massey Ferguson 5712SL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | Puma 115 | 5712SL | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Massey Ferguson 5712SL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | AGCO Power | — |
| Power Output | 115hp | 115hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ Puma 115+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 411ci | 269ci | ▲ Puma 115+142 ci · +53% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 5712SL+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.7in | ▲ Puma 115+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Massey Ferguson 5712SL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 18-speed partial power shift | Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Massey Ferguson 5712SL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 172in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 90.6in | — |
| Height | 118in | 111in | ▲ Puma 115+7 in · +6% |
| Operating Weight | 13,230lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Massey Ferguson 5712SL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Massey Ferguson 5712SL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 2/3N | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Massey Ferguson 5712SL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Massey Ferguson 5712SL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Massey Ferguson 5712SL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier IV | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | Selective catalytic reduction | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 115 | Massey Ferguson 5712SL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 88th percentile (115 hp)B · 88th percentile (115 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 91st percentile (411 ci)B · 77th percentile (269 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 83rd percentile (18)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Height
median 94.1 inA · 94th percentile (118 in)B · 89th percentile (111 in)
A · Puma 115B · 5712SLMedian Utility Tractor