Head to head · Utility

CaseIH Puma 115 vs New Holland T6030 Delta

CaseIHCaseIH Puma 115
vs
New HollandNew Holland T6030 Delta

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 4,321–5,720

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Puma 115115 hp
T6030 Delta115 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

Puma 115 is in the 88th percentile; T6030 Delta is in the 88th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Puma 115 higher · +1 ci (<1%)
Puma 115411 ci
T6030 Delta410 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

Puma 115 is in the 91st percentile; T6030 Delta is in the 91st · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1156
T6030 Delta6
Median Utility Tractor4

Puma 115 is in the 93rd percentile; T6030 Delta is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ Puma 115 higher · +2 (+13%)
Puma 11518
T6030 Delta16
Median Utility Tractor12

Puma 115 is in the 83rd percentile; T6030 Delta is in the 73rd · 4,941 models

Puma 115 (A)T6030 Delta (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 115New Holland T6030 DeltaDifference
ManufacturerCaseIHNew Holland—
ModelPuma 115T6030 Delta—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 115New Holland T6030 DeltaDifference
ManufacturerCNHCNHSame
Power Output115hp115hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci410ci▲ Puma 115+1 ci · <1%
Bore4.1in4.1inSame
Stroke5.2in5.2inSame

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 115New Holland T6030 DeltaDifference
Type18-speed partial power shiftSelective gear fixed ratio with partial (8) range-operator controlled powershift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 115New Holland T6030 DeltaDifference
LengthNot recorded169in—
WidthNot recorded75.2in—
Height118in114in▲ Puma 115+4 in · +4%
Operating Weight13,230lb11,065lb▲ Puma 115+2,165 lb · +20%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 115New Holland T6030 DeltaDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensated (PFC)Direct engine drive—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH Puma 115New Holland T6030 DeltaDifference
TypeNot recordedIndependent with electro-hydraulic clutch—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 115New Holland T6030 DeltaDifference
Hitch Type2/3NThree-point—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedII—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch CapacityNot recorded6,450lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 115New Holland T6030 DeltaDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDNot recorded—
Drive Type4WD2WD—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discHydraulic wet discSame

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 115New Holland T6030 DeltaDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 115New Holland T6030 DeltaDifference
TypeNot recordedOpen—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 88th percentile (115 hp)B · 88th percentile (115 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 91st percentile (411 ci)B · 91st percentile (410 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 83rd percentile (18)B · 73rd percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 92nd percentile (13,230 lb)B · 88th percentile (11,065 lb)
A · Puma 115B · T6030 DeltaMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 115Full spec pageNew Holland T6030 Delta