Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 145 vs CaseIH Puma 150

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 145

Row Crop

power
146 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 145 specs
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B

CaseIH Puma 150

Row Crop

power
150 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 150 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 145
vs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 150

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

▲ Puma 150 higher · +4 hp (+3%)
Puma 145146 hp
Puma 150150 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 145 is in the 55th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 57th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
Puma 145411 ci
Puma 150411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 145 is in the 60th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 60th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1456
Puma 1506
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 145 is in the 50th percentile; Puma 150 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
Puma 14518
Puma 15018
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 145 is in the 61st percentile; Puma 150 is in the 61st · 1,200 models

Puma 145 (A)Puma 150 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 145CaseIH Puma 150Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHCaseIHSame
ModelPuma 145Puma 150—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 145CaseIH Puma 150Difference
ManufacturerFPTFPTSame
ModelNot recordedTurbocharged with Air-to-Air Aftercooling Diesel—
Power Output146hp150hp▲ Puma 150+4 hp · +3%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci411ciSame
Bore4.1in4.1inSame
Stroke5.2in5.2inSame

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 145CaseIH Puma 150Difference
TypeFull power shiftFull power shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 145CaseIH Puma 150Difference
Width61.4inNot recorded—
HeightNot recorded118in—
Operating Weight14,350lb13,900lb▲ Puma 145+450 lb · +3%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 145CaseIH Puma 150Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating—
Steering TypeNot recordedPower—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 145CaseIH Puma 150Difference
Hitch Type2/3NRear Type II—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedCategory 2—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch CapacityNot recorded24,251lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 145CaseIH Puma 150Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WDMFWD 4WD—
Steering TypeNot recordedPower—
Brake TypeElectro-hydraulic wet discNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 145CaseIH Puma 150Difference
Battery VoltageNot recorded12V—
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 145CaseIH Puma 150Difference
StandardInterim Tier 4Not recorded—
Control SystemSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 145CaseIH Puma 150Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 55th percentile (146 hp)B · 57th percentile (150 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 61st percentile (18)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 63rd percentile (14,350 lb)B · 62nd percentile (13,900 lb)
A · Puma 145B · Puma 150Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 145Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 150