Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 165 X vs Ford 9000

Image not recorded
FordModel B

Ford 9000

Row Crop

power
145 hp
displacement
401 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 9000 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 165 X
vs
FordFord 9000

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

▲ Puma 165 X higher · +20 hp (+14%)
Puma 165 X165 hp
9000145 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 165 X is in the 65th percentile; 9000 is in the 54th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Puma 165 X higher · +10 ci (+2%)
Puma 165 X411 ci
9000401 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 165 X is in the 60th percentile; 9000 is in the 51st · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 165 X6
90006
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 165 X is in the 50th percentile; 9000 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ Puma 165 X higher · +3 (+19%)
Puma 165 X19
900016
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 165 X is in the 68th percentile; 9000 is in the 50th · 1,200 models

Puma 165 X (A)9000 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 165 XFord 9000Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHFord—
ModelPuma 165 X9000—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 165 XFord 9000Difference
ManufacturerFPTFord—
Power Output165hp145hp▲ Puma 165 X+20 hp · +14%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci401ci▲ Puma 165 X+10 ci · +2%
Bore4.1in4.4in▲ 9000+0.3 in · +7%
Stroke5.2in4.4in▲ Puma 165 X+0.8 in · +18%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 165 XFord 9000Difference
Type19-speed partial power shiftGear / Partial power shift—

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 165 XFord 9000Difference
System TypePressure flow compensatedOpen center—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH Puma 165 XFord 9000Difference
TypeNot recordedIndependent—
Speed 1Not recorded1,000rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 165 XFord 9000Difference
Hitch TypeIII/IIThree-Point Hitch—
Hitch CategoryCategory 3III/II—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 165 XFord 9000Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x2 2WD—
Drive Type4WD2WD—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame
Brake TypeNot recordedDifferential hydraulic wet disc—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 165 XFord 9000Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Puma 165 XFord 9000Difference
CoolantNot recorded6gal—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 165 XFord 9000Difference
TypeNot recordedOpen operator station or Cab (optional)—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 65th percentile (165 hp)B · 54th percentile (145 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 51st percentile (401 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 68th percentile (19)B · 50th percentile (16)
A · Puma 165 XB · 9000Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 165 XFull spec pageFord 9000