CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 165 X
Row Crop
- power
- 165 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 165 X vs New Holland TM165
New HollandModel B
New Holland TM165
Row Crop
- power
- 165 hp
- displacement
- 456 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 165 X
vs
New HollandNew Holland TM165
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedPuma 165 X165 hp
TM165165 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 165 X is in the 65th percentile; TM165 is in the 65th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TM165 higher · +45 ci (+11%)Puma 165 X411 ci
TM165456 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 165 X is in the 60th percentile; TM165 is in the 80th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 165 X6
TM1656
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 165 X is in the 50th percentile; TM165 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 165 X higher · +1 (+6%)Puma 165 X19
TM16518
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 165 X is in the 68th percentile; TM165 is in the 61st · 1,200 models
Puma 165 X (A)TM165 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 X | New Holland TM165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 165 X | TM165 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 X | New Holland TM165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | New Holland | — |
| Power Output | 165hp | 165hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,300RPM | ▲ TM165+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 456ci | ▲ TM165+45 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.4in | ▲ TM165+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Puma 165 X+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 X | New Holland TM165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 19-speed partial power shift | Selective gear fixed ratio with partial (6) range operator controlled powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 X | New Holland TM165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 79.2in | — |
| Operating Weight | Not recorded | 13,845lb | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 X | New Holland TM165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensated | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | Not recorded | 32.9gpm | — |
| Pressure | Not recorded | 2,465psi | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 X | New Holland TM165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 16.9R28 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 20.8R38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 X | New Holland TM165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/II | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 8,455lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 X | New Holland TM165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD (front wheel assist) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 X | New Holland TM165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 X | New Holland TM165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 X | New Holland TM165 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 65th percentile (165 hp)B · 65th percentile (165 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 80th percentile (456 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 68th percentile (19)B · 61st percentile (18)
A · Puma 165 XB · TM165Median Row Crop Tractor