CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 165
Row Crop
- power
- 165 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 165 vs Denning B Pug
DenningModel B
Denning B Pug
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 316 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 165
vs
DenningDenning B Pug
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 165 higher · +95 ci (+30%)Puma 165411 ci
B Pug316 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 165 is in the 63rd percentile; B Pug is in the 35th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ Puma 165 higher · +2 (+50%)Puma 1656
B Pug4
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 165 is in the 50th percentile; B Pug is in the 17th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Puma 165 higher · +14,225 lb (+406%)Puma 16517,725 lb
B Pug3,500 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 165 is in the 76th percentile; B Pug is in the 3rd · 1,350 models
Puma 165 (A)B Pug (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Denning | — |
| Model | Puma 165 | B Pug | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Utility, Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH / FPT | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 165hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ Puma 165+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 411ci | 316ci | ▲ Puma 165+95 ci · +30% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.4in | ▲ B Pug+0.3 in · +7% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.3in | ▲ B Pug+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 17,725lb | 3,500lb | ▲ Puma 165+14,225 lb · +406% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Manual | — |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 16.9-30 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 20.8-42 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 165 | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 35th percentile (316 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 17th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 76th percentile (17,725 lb)B · 3rd percentile (3,500 lb)
A · Puma 165B · B PugMedian Row Crop Tractor