CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 170
Row Crop
- power
- 167 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 170 vs John Deere 6R 175
John DeereModel B
John Deere 6R 175
Row Crop
- power
- 173 hp
- displacement
- 415 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 170
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 6R 175
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 6R 175 higher · +6 hp (+4%)Puma 170167 hp
6R 175173 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 170 is in the 66th percentile; 6R 175 is in the 68th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 6R 175 higher · +4 ci (<1%)Puma 170411 ci
6R 175415 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 170 is in the 60th percentile; 6R 175 is in the 69th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1706
6R 1756
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 170 is in the 50th percentile; 6R 175 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Puma 170 higher · +442 lb (+2%)Puma 17018,740 lb
6R 17518,298 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 170 is in the 81st percentile; 6R 175 is in the 79th · 1,350 models
Puma 170 (A)6R 175 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | John Deere 6R 175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | John Deere | — |
| Model | Puma 170 | 6R 175 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | John Deere 6R 175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | John Deere | — |
| Model | Not recorded | PowerTech PVS | — |
| Power Output | 167hp | 173hp | ▲ 6R 175+6 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,600RPM | ▲ Puma 170+600 RPM · +38% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 415ci | ▲ 6R 175+4 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 6R 175+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Puma 170+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | John Deere 6R 175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | IVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | John Deere 6R 175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 110in | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,740lb | 18,298lb | ▲ Puma 170+442 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | John Deere 6R 175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC) | Closed-center PFC | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | John Deere 6R 175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 2/3N | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | John Deere 6R 175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4 Wheel Drive (4WD) | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | John Deere 6R 175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 170 | John Deere 6R 175 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | SCR | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 66th percentile (167 hp)B · 68th percentile (173 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 69th percentile (415 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 81st percentile (18,740 lb)B · 79th percentile (18,298 lb)
A · Puma 170B · 6R 175Median Row Crop Tractor