Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 170 vs Massey Ferguson 7619

Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 7619

Row Crop

power
173 hp
displacement
402 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 7619 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 170
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 7619

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,2061,417

Engine Power

▲ 7619 higher · +6 hp (+4%)
Puma 170167 hp
7619173 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 170 is in the 66th percentile; 7619 is in the 68th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ Puma 170 higher · +9 ci (+2%)
Puma 170411 ci
7619402 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 170 is in the 60th percentile; 7619 is in the 52nd · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1706
76196
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 170 is in the 50th percentile; 7619 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Operating Weight

▲ Puma 170 higher · +245 lb (+1%)
Puma 17018,740 lb
761918,495 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb

Puma 170 is in the 81st percentile; 7619 is in the 80th · 1,350 models

Puma 170 (A)7619 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 170Massey Ferguson 7619Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHMassey Ferguson
ModelPuma 1707619
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 170Massey Ferguson 7619Difference
ManufacturerFPTSisu AGCO Power
Power Output167hp173hp7619+6 hp · +4%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,100RPMPuma 170+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci402ciPuma 170+9 ci · +2%
Bore4.1in4.3in7619+0.2 in · +5%
Stroke5.2in4.7inPuma 170+0.5 in · +11%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 170Massey Ferguson 7619Difference
TypeFull power shiftCVT with two mechanical ranges

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 170Massey Ferguson 7619Difference
LengthNot recorded204in
HeightNot recorded121in
WheelbaseNot recorded118in
Operating Weight18,740lb18,495lbPuma 170+245 lb · +1%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 170Massey Ferguson 7619Difference
System TypeClosed Center Pressure Flow Compensating (PFC)Closed-center load sensing (CCLS)
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame

Tires

SpecCaseIH Puma 170Massey Ferguson 7619Difference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded420/90R30
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded480/80R46

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 170Massey Ferguson 7619Difference
Hitch Type2/3NNot recorded
Hitch CategoryNot recordedIII

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 170Massey Ferguson 7619Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4 Wheel Drive (4WD)MFWD
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 170Massey Ferguson 7619Difference
Starter TypeElectric12 volt electric

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 170Massey Ferguson 7619Difference
Control SystemSCRSCRSame

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 170Massey Ferguson 7619Difference
TypeNot recordedCab without quick attach

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 66th percentile (167 hp)B · 68th percentile (173 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 52nd percentile (402 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 81st percentile (18,740 lb)B · 80th percentile (18,495 lb)
A · Puma 170B · 7619Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 170Full spec pageMassey Ferguson 7619