Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 185 vs New Holland T7030

Image not recorded
New HollandModel B

New Holland T7030

Row Crop

power
186 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
19
Full T7030 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 185
vs
New HollandNew Holland T7030

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

▲ T7030 higher · +1 hp (<1%)
Puma 185185 hp
T7030186 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 185 is in the 72nd percentile; T7030 is in the 72nd · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
Puma 185411 ci
T7030411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 185 is in the 60th percentile; T7030 is in the 60th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 1856
T70306
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 185 is in the 50th percentile; T7030 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ T7030 higher · +1 (+6%)
Puma 18518
T703019
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 185 is in the 61st percentile; T7030 is in the 68th · 1,200 models

Puma 185 (A)T7030 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7030Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHNew Holland—
ModelPuma 185T7030—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7030Difference
ManufacturerFPTCNH (Case New Holland) Osterreich GmbH—
ModelNot recordedNEF—
Power Output185hp186hp▲ T7030+1 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci411ciSame
Bore4.1in4.1inSame
Stroke5.2in5.2inSame

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7030Difference
Type18-speed full power shift19-speed full range operator-controlled powershift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7030Difference
LengthNot recorded190in—
WidthNot recorded91.9in—
HeightNot recorded120in—
Operating Weight18,135lb17,890lb▲ Puma 185+245 lb · +1%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7030Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)Closed center load sensing (CCLS)—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic powerSame

Tread Width

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7030Difference
Front Tread Width60inNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7030Difference
Hitch TypeType 2/3NNot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7030Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic powerSame

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7030Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7030Difference
Control SystemSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 185New Holland T7030Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 72nd percentile (185 hp)B · 72nd percentile (186 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 68th percentile (19)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 78th percentile (18,135 lb)B · 77th percentile (17,890 lb)
A · Puma 185B · T7030Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 185Full spec pageNew Holland T7030