CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 185
Row Crop
- power
- 185 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 185 vs Massey Ferguson 7620
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 7620
Row Crop
- power
- 183 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 185
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 7620
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 185 higher · +2 hp (+1%)Puma 185185 hp
7620183 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 185 is in the 72nd percentile; 7620 is in the 71st · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 185 higher · +9 ci (+2%)Puma 185411 ci
7620402 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 185 is in the 60th percentile; 7620 is in the 52nd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1856
76206
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 185 is in the 50th percentile; 7620 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Puma 185 higher · +445 lb (+3%)Puma 18518,135 lb
762017,690 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 185 is in the 78th percentile; 7620 is in the 76th · 1,350 models
Puma 185 (A)7620 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | Puma 185 | 7620 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Sisu | — |
| Power Output | 185hp | 183hp | ▲ Puma 185+2 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,951RPM | ▲ Puma 185+249 RPM · +13% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 402ci | ▲ Puma 185+9 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 7620+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.7in | ▲ Puma 185+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 18-speed full power shift | CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 204in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 121in | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 118in | — |
| Operating Weight | 18,135lb | 17,690lb | ▲ Puma 185+445 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed-center load sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Tread Width
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | 60in | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Type 2/3N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 185 | Massey Ferguson 7620 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 72nd percentile (185 hp)B · 71st percentile (183 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 52nd percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 78th percentile (18,135 lb)B · 76th percentile (17,690 lb)
A · Puma 185B · 7620Median Row Crop Tractor