CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 195
Row Crop
- power
- 195 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 195 vs John Deere 7815
John DeereModel B
John Deere 7815
Row Crop
- power
- 202 hp
- displacement
- 414 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 195
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 7815
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 7815 higher · +7 hp (+4%)Puma 195195 hp
7815202 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 195 is in the 75th percentile; 7815 is in the 77th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 7815 higher · +3 ci (<1%)Puma 195411 ci
7815414 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 195 is in the 63rd percentile; 7815 is in the 66th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1956
78156
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 195 is in the 50th percentile; 7815 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 7815 higher · +225 lb (+1%)Puma 19517,635 lb
781517,860 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 195 is in the 75th percentile; 7815 is in the 77th · 1,350 models
Puma 195 (A)7815 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | John Deere | — |
| Model | Puma 195 | 7815 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | John Deere | — |
| Power Output | 195hp | 202hp | ▲ 7815+7 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Puma 195+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 414ci | ▲ 7815+3 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.2in | ▲ 7815+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5in | ▲ Puma 195+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Partial power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 212in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 96in | — |
| Height | 123in | 123in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 17,635lb | 17,860lb | ▲ 7815+225 lb · +1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | 3/3N | — |
| Hitch Category | II/IIIN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 7.7gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | John Deere 7815 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 75th percentile (195 hp)B · 77th percentile (202 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 66th percentile (414 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 75th percentile (17,635 lb)B · 77th percentile (17,860 lb)
Height
median 114 inA · 80th percentile (123 in)B · 81st percentile (123 in)
A · Puma 195B · 7815Median Row Crop Tractor