CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 195
Row Crop
- power
- 195 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 195 vs New Holland T7050
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T7050
Row Crop
- power
- 199 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 19
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 195
vs
New HollandNew Holland T7050
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ T7050 higher · +4 hp (+2%)Puma 195195 hp
T7050199 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 195 is in the 75th percentile; T7050 is in the 76th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedPuma 195411 ci
T7050411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 195 is in the 63rd percentile; T7050 is in the 60th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 1956
T70506
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 195 is in the 50th percentile; T7050 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
= Effectively tiedPuma 19517,635 lb
T705017,635 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 195 is in the 75th percentile; T7050 is in the 75th · 1,350 models
Puma 195 (A)T7050 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | New Holland T7050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 195 | T7050 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | New Holland T7050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CNH | CNH Diesel | — |
| Model | Not recorded | NEF | — |
| Power Output | 195hp | 199hp | ▲ T7050+4 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 411ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | New Holland T7050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | New Holland T7050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 190in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 91.9in | — |
| Height | 123in | 120in | ▲ Puma 195+3 in · +3% |
| Operating Weight | 17,635lb | 17,635lb | Same |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | New Holland T7050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | hydrostatic power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | New Holland T7050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | New Holland T7050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD front wheel assist | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | hydrostatic power | Same |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc hydraulically operated by two foot pedals that can be locked together | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | New Holland T7050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 195 | New Holland T7050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 75th percentile (195 hp)B · 76th percentile (199 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 60th percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 75th percentile (17,635 lb)B · 75th percentile (17,635 lb)
Height
median 114 inA · 80th percentile (123 in)B · 71st percentile (120 in)
A · Puma 195B · T7050Median Row Crop Tractor