Head to head · Row Crop

CaseIH Puma 200 vs John Deere 8120

Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A

CaseIH Puma 200

Row Crop

power
200 hp
displacement
411 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full Puma 200 specs
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B

John Deere 8120

Row Crop

power
200 hp
displacement
496 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 8120 specs
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 200
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 8120

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop

n = 1,200–1,417

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Puma 200200 hp
8120200 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp

Puma 200 is in the 77th percentile; 8120 is in the 77th · 1,206 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 8120 higher · +85 ci (+21%)
Puma 200411 ci
8120496 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci

Puma 200 is in the 60th percentile; 8120 is in the 85th · 1,409 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Puma 2006
81206
Median Row Crop Tractor6

Puma 200 is in the 50th percentile; 8120 is in the 50th · 1,417 models

Forward Gears

▲ Puma 200 higher · +2 (+13%)
Puma 20018
812016
Median Row Crop Tractor16

Puma 200 is in the 61st percentile; 8120 is in the 50th · 1,200 models

Puma 200 (A)8120 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 8120Difference
ManufacturerCaseIHJohn Deere—
ModelPuma 2008120—
CategoryRow CropRow CropSame

Engine

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 8120Difference
ManufacturerFPTJohn Deere—
Power Output200hp200hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,200RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement411ci496ci▲ 8120+85 ci · +21%
Bore4.1in4.6in▲ 8120+0.5 in · +12%
Stroke5.2in5.1in▲ Puma 200+0.1 in · +2%

Transmission

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 8120Difference
TypeFull power shiftFull power shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 8120Difference
LengthNot recorded210in—
Width60inNot recorded—
HeightNot recorded120in—
Operating Weight18,940lb19,105lb▲ 8120+165 lb · <1%

Hydraulics

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 8120Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensating (PFC)Closed center pressure-flow compensated (PFC)—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic powerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 8120Difference
TypeNot recordedIndependent—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 8120Difference
Hitch Type2/3NIII/IIIN—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedIIIN—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch CapacityNot recorded12,353lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 8120Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WDNot recorded—
Drive Type4WD4x2 (2WD)—
Steering TypeHydrostatic powerHydrostatic powerSame
Brake TypeNot recordedHydraulic wet disc—

Electrical

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 8120Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 8120Difference
StandardInterim Tier 4Not recorded—
Control SystemSelective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Capacities

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 8120Difference
CoolantNot recorded9gal—

Operator Station

SpecCaseIH Puma 200John Deere 8120Difference
TypeNot recordedCab (standard)—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 138 hp
A · 77th percentile (200 hp)B · 77th percentile (200 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 391 ci
A · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 85th percentile (496 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 61st percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 12,307 lb
A · 81st percentile (18,940 lb)B · 81st percentile (19,105 lb)
A · Puma 200B · 8120Median Row Crop Tractor
Full spec pageCaseIH Puma 200Full spec pageJohn Deere 8120