CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 220
Row Crop
- power
- 220 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 220 vs Deutz F2L612 4
Image not recorded
DeutzModel B
Deutz F2L612 4
Sub-Compact
- power
- 21.7 hp
- displacement
- 93.1 ci
- Cylinders
- 2
- Forward gears
- 10
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 220
vs
DeutzDeutz F2L612 4
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 220 higher · +198 hp (+914%)Puma 220220 hp
F2L612 421.7 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 220 is in the 82nd percentile; F2L612 4 is in the 2nd · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 220 higher · +318 ci (+341%)Puma 220411 ci
F2L612 493.1 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 220 is in the 60th percentile; F2L612 4 is in the 1st · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ Puma 220 higher · +4 (+200%)Puma 2206
F2L612 42
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 220 is in the 50th percentile; F2L612 4 is in the 1st · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ Puma 220 higher · +8 (+80%)Puma 22018
F2L612 410
Median Row Crop Tractor16
Puma 220 is in the 61st percentile; F2L612 4 is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
Puma 220 (A)F2L612 4 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Deutz F2L612 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Deutz | — |
| Model | Puma 220 | F2L612 4 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Deutz F2L612 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Deutz | — |
| Power Output | 220hp | 21.7hp | ▲ Puma 220+198 hp · +914% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Puma 220+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 2 | ▲ Puma 220+4 · +200% |
| Displacement | 411ci | 93.1ci | ▲ Puma 220+318 ci · +341% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 3.5in | ▲ Puma 220+0.6 in · +17% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 4.7in | ▲ Puma 220+0.5 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Deutz F2L612 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 18-speed full power shift | Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Deutz F2L612 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 107in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 63in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 60.6in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,900lb | 2,954lb | ▲ Puma 220+12,946 lb · +438% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Deutz F2L612 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Deutz F2L612 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II/IIIN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 28,660lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Deutz F2L612 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Deutz F2L612 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Deutz F2L612 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective Catalytic Reduction | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 82nd percentile (220 hp)B · 2nd percentile (21.7 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 1st percentile (93.1 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 1st percentile (2)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 61st percentile (18)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 70th percentile (15,900 lb)B · 2nd percentile (2,954 lb)
A · Puma 220B · F2L612 4Median Row Crop Tractor