CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 220
Row Crop
- power
- 220 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 220 vs Fendt 927 Vario
FendtModel B
Fendt 927 Vario
Row Crop
- power
- 240 hp
- displacement
- 436 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 220
vs
FendtFendt 927 Vario
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ 927 Vario higher · +20 hp (+9%)Puma 220220 hp
927 Vario240 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 220 is in the 82nd percentile; 927 Vario is in the 86th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 927 Vario higher · +25 ci (+6%)Puma 220411 ci
927 Vario436 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 220 is in the 60th percentile; 927 Vario is in the 74th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2206
927 Vario6
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 220 is in the 50th percentile; 927 Vario is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ 927 Vario higher · +6,320 lb (+40%)Puma 22015,900 lb
927 Vario22,220 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 220 is in the 70th percentile; 927 Vario is in the 89th · 1,350 models
Puma 220 (A)927 Vario (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Fendt 927 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Fendt | — |
| Model | Puma 220 | 927 Vario | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Fendt 927 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | Deutz | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 2013 L06 4V | — |
| Power Output | 220hp | 240hp | ▲ 927 Vario+20 hp · +9% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 436ci | ▲ 927 Vario+25 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 927 Vario+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.1in | ▲ Puma 220+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Fendt 927 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 18-speed full power shift | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Fendt 927 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 223in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 108in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 131in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,900lb | 22,220lb | ▲ 927 Vario+6,320 lb · +40% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Fendt 927 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating | Load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Fendt 927 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II/IIIN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 28,660lb | 33,000lb | ▲ 927 Vario+4,340 lb · +15% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Fendt 927 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Fendt 927 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | Fendt 927 Vario | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective Catalytic Reduction | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 82nd percentile (220 hp)B · 86th percentile (240 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 74th percentile (436 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 70th percentile (15,900 lb)B · 89th percentile (22,220 lb)
3-Point Hitch Capacity
median 11,023 lbA · 93rd percentile (28,660 lb)B · 97th percentile (33,000 lb)
A · Puma 220B · 927 VarioMedian Row Crop Tractor