CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 220
Row Crop
- power
- 220 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 220 vs New Holland T7.270
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T7.270
Row Crop
- power
- 269 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 220
vs
New HollandNew Holland T7.270
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ T7.270 higher · +49 hp (+22%)Puma 220220 hp
T7.270269 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 220 is in the 82nd percentile; T7.270 is in the 90th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedPuma 220411 ci
T7.270411 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 220 is in the 60th percentile; T7.270 is in the 63rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2206
T7.2706
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 220 is in the 50th percentile; T7.270 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ Puma 220 higher · +578 lb (+4%)Puma 22015,900 lb
T7.27015,322 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 220 is in the 70th percentile; T7.270 is in the 68th · 1,350 models
Puma 220 (A)T7.270 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | New Holland T7.270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 220 | T7.270 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | New Holland T7.270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | FPT | Same |
| Power Output | 220hp | 269hp | ▲ T7.270+49 hp · +22% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 411ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | New Holland T7.270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 18-speed full power shift | Continuously-variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | New Holland T7.270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 227in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 97.2in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 123in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,900lb | 15,322lb | ▲ Puma 220+578 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | New Holland T7.270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | New Holland T7.270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II/IIIN | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | III/II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 28,660lb | 28,660lb | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | New Holland T7.270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | New Holland T7.270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | New Holland T7.270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Selective Catalytic Reduction | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 220 | New Holland T7.270 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 82nd percentile (220 hp)B · 90th percentile (269 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 60th percentile (411 ci)B · 63rd percentile (411 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 70th percentile (15,900 lb)B · 68th percentile (15,322 lb)
3-Point Hitch Capacity
median 11,023 lbA · 93rd percentile (28,660 lb)B · 93rd percentile (28,660 lb)
A · Puma 220B · T7.270Median Row Crop Tractor