Image not recorded
CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 225
Agricultural
- power
- 225 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
CaseIH Puma 225 vs CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac
Image not recorded
CaseIHModel B
CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac
Agricultural
- power
- 535 hp
- displacement
- 912 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 225
vs
CaseIHCaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ STX530QT Quadtrac higher · +310 hp (+138%)Puma 225225 hp
STX530QT Quadtrac535 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
Puma 225 is in the 84th percentile; STX530QT Quadtrac is in the 99th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ STX530QT Quadtrac higher · +501 ci (+122%)Puma 225411 ci
STX530QT Quadtrac912 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
Puma 225 is in the 70th percentile; STX530QT Quadtrac is in the 97th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2256
STX530QT Quadtrac6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
Puma 225 is in the 74th percentile; STX530QT Quadtrac is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ STX530QT Quadtrac higher · +35,910 lb (+218%)Puma 22516,500 lb
STX530QT Quadtrac52,410 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
Puma 225 is in the 75th percentile; STX530QT Quadtrac is in the 99th · 971 models
Puma 225 (A)STX530QT Quadtrac (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | CaseIH | Same |
| Model | Puma 225 | STX530QT Quadtrac | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CDC | Cummins | — |
| Model | 24-valve | QSX15 | — |
| Power Output | 225hp | 535hp | ▲ STX530QT Quadtrac+310 hp · +138% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ Puma 225+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 912ci | ▲ STX530QT Quadtrac+501 ci · +122% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 5.4in | ▲ STX530QT Quadtrac+1.3 in · +32% |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 6.7in | ▲ STX530QT Quadtrac+1.5 in · +29% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 36in | — |
| Height | 123in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 16,500lb | 52,410lb | ▲ STX530QT Quadtrac+35,910 lb · +218% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Pressure Flow Compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | 2/3N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4N | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Quad Track | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 225 | CaseIH STX530QT Quadtrac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 84th percentile (225 hp)B · 99th percentile (535 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 70th percentile (411 ci)B · 97th percentile (912 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 75th percentile (16,500 lb)B · 99th percentile (52,410 lb)
A · Puma 225B · STX530QT QuadtracMedian Agricultural Tractor