CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Puma 230
Row Crop
- power
- 231 hp
- displacement
- 411 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
CaseIH Puma 230 vs New Holland T7070
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T7070
Row Crop
- power
- 215 hp
- displacement
- 410 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
CaseIHCaseIH Puma 230
vs
New HollandNew Holland T7070
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Power
▲ Puma 230 higher · +16 hp (+7%)Puma 230231 hp
T7070215 hp
Median Row Crop Tractor138 hp
Puma 230 is in the 84th percentile; T7070 is in the 80th · 1,206 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Puma 230 higher · +1 ci (<1%)Puma 230411 ci
T7070410 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
Puma 230 is in the 63rd percentile; T7070 is in the 58th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedPuma 2306
T70706
Median Row Crop Tractor6
Puma 230 is in the 50th percentile; T7070 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ T7070 higher · +355 lb (+2%)Puma 23019,800 lb
T707020,155 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
Puma 230 is in the 84th percentile; T7070 is in the 85th · 1,350 models
Puma 230 (A)T7070 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland T7070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | New Holland | — |
| Model | Puma 230 | T7070 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland T7070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | FPT | FPT (Fiat Powertrain Technologies) | — |
| Model | Not recorded | NEF | — |
| Power Output | 231hp | 215hp | ▲ Puma 230+16 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 411ci | 410ci | ▲ Puma 230+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.2in | 5.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland T7070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland T7070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 217in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 91.9in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 125in | — |
| Operating Weight | 19,800lb | 20,155lb | ▲ T7070+355 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland T7070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure flow compensating (PFC) | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Tires
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland T7070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 420/90R30 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 520/85R42 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland T7070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: 2/3N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland T7070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Hydrostatic power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland T7070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland T7070 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier 3 | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 138 hpA · 84th percentile (231 hp)B · 80th percentile (215 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 63rd percentile (411 ci)B · 58th percentile (410 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 84th percentile (19,800 lb)B · 85th percentile (20,155 lb)
A · Puma 230B · T7070Median Row Crop Tractor