CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Quadtrac 9380QT
Articulated
- power
- 400 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
Head to head · Articulated
CaseIH Quadtrac 9380QT vs Challenger MT765E
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT765E
Articulated
- power
- 405 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Quadtrac 9380QT
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ MT765E higher · +5 hp (+1%)Quadtrac 9380QT400 hp
MT765E405 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
Quadtrac 9380QT is in the 33rd percentile; MT765E is in the 35th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Quadtrac 9380QT higher · +256 ci (+43%)Quadtrac 9380QT855 ci
MT765E599 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
Quadtrac 9380QT is in the 55th percentile; MT765E is in the 6th · 61 models
Cylinders
▲ MT765E higher · +1 (+17%)Quadtrac 9380QT6
MT765E7
Median Articulated Tractor6
Quadtrac 9380QT is in the 50th percentile; MT765E is in the 92nd · 61 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT765E higher · +4 (+33%)Quadtrac 9380QT12
MT765E16
Median Articulated Tractor16
Quadtrac 9380QT is in the 11th percentile; MT765E is in the 50th · 59 models
Quadtrac 9380QT (A)MT765E (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac 9380QT | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Quadtrac 9380QT | MT765E | — |
| Category | Articulated | Articulated | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac 9380QT | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | AGCO POWER | — |
| Model | N14 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 400hp | 405hp | ▲ MT765E+5 hp · +1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 7 | ▲ MT765E+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 855ci | 599ci | ▲ Quadtrac 9380QT+256 ci · +43% |
| Bore | 5.5in | 4.4in | ▲ Quadtrac 9380QT+1.1 in · +25% |
| Stroke | 6in | 5.7in | ▲ Quadtrac 9380QT+0.3 in · +5% |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac 9380QT | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac 9380QT | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 120in | 120in | Same |
| Height | 140in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 44,000lb | 33,235lb | ▲ Quadtrac 9380QT+10,765 lb · +32% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac 9380QT | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-Hydraulic Differential | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac 9380QT | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IV | Cat 3 | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | IVN/III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 39,000lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac 9380QT | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-Hydraulic Differential | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated by foot pedal | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac 9380QT | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac 9380QT | Challenger MT765E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 33rd percentile (400 hp)B · 35th percentile (405 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 55th percentile (855 ci)B · 6th percentile (599 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 92nd percentile (7)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 11th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 32nd percentile (44,000 lb)B · 6th percentile (33,235 lb)
A · Quadtrac 9380QTB · MT765EMedian Articulated Tractor