CaseIHModel A
CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT
Articulated
- power
- 535 hp
- displacement
- 912 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT vs Challenger MT865
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT865
Articulated
- power
- 524 hp
- displacement
- 964 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
CaseIHCaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT865
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ Quadtrac Steiger 530QT higher · +11 hp (+2%)Quadtrac Steiger 530QT535 hp
MT865524 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT is in the 81st percentile; MT865 is in the 77th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT865 higher · +52 ci (+6%)Quadtrac Steiger 530QT912 ci
MT865964 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT is in the 67th percentile; MT865 is in the 90th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedQuadtrac Steiger 530QT6
MT8656
Median Articulated Tractor6
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT is in the 50th percentile; MT865 is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedQuadtrac Steiger 530QT16
MT86516
Median Articulated Tractor16
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT is in the 50th percentile; MT865 is in the 50th · 59 models
Quadtrac Steiger 530QT (A)MT865 (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | CaseIH | Challenger | — |
| Model | Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | MT865 | — |
| Category | Articulated | Articulated | Same |
Engine
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cummins | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | QSX15 | C16 | — |
| Power Output | 535hp | 524hp | ▲ Quadtrac Steiger 530QT+11 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,750RPM | ▲ Quadtrac Steiger 530QT+350 RPM · +20% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 912ci | 964ci | ▲ MT865+52 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 5.4in | 5.5in | ▲ MT865+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 6.7in | 6.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full powershift | Selective gear fixed ratio with full operator-controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 266in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 142in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 139in | — |
| Operating Weight | 52,410lb | 44,220lb | ▲ Quadtrac Steiger 530QT+8,190 lb · +19% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | — |
Electrical
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric (24 volts) | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | CaseIH Quadtrac Steiger 530QT | Challenger MT865 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 81st percentile (535 hp)B · 77th percentile (524 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 67th percentile (912 ci)B · 90th percentile (964 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 52nd percentile (52,410 lb)B · 34th percentile (44,220 lb)
A · Quadtrac Steiger 530QTB · MT865Median Articulated Tractor